Global Ethics Corner: Should the International Community Intervene in Syria?

Feb 17, 2012

It's been almost a year since demonstrations started in Syria and the government crackdown gets bloodier every day. With sanctions not producing results, is it time for a military intervention? Or do conditions on the ground and possible civilian deaths make this option too risky?

It's been almost a year since the start of anti-government protests in Syria in March 2011. What began as small and fragmented demonstrations has evolved into a bloody confrontation between the Syrian government and opposition forces.

The ongoing government crackdown on civilians has grown increasingly violent and has drawn the attention of the international community.

Last December, the Arab League, in an attempt to stop violence, sent an observer mission to Syria. It lasted little more than a month and ended amid a surge in fighting between the Syrian government and the opposition.

On February 4, 2012, members of the UN Security Council, led by the U.S., sought a resolution to condemn the bloodshed in Syria and stop the violence—a move blocked by a veto from Russia and China.

Experts are debating how to deal with the crisis. Some argue that the current sanctions policy is weak and stronger sanctions may not work either. The Assad regime has previously withstood sanctions. Plus, it has a strong alliance with Iran. Therefore, the argument goes, efforts to stop the bloodshed must be scaled up, either by imposing a no-fly zone to create a ''safe area'' for Syrian rebels, or by providing financial and military support to the Syrian opposition.

Critics contend that force should be ruled out because conditions on the ground make a successful humanitarian intervention unlikely. For example, they argue that clashes between government forces and rebels occur in densely populated urban environments and thus a no-fly-zone would be hard to enforce. Moreover, they warn against a possible proxy-war fought at the expense of innocent civilians.

Where do you stand? Should there be an intervention in Syria?

By Emil Chireno

Photo Credits in order of Appearance:
syriana2011 [also for picture 6]
Elizabeth Arrott, Voice of America [also for pictures 3, 11, and 12]
Alyssa
JD Lasica
Fabio Rodrigues Pozzebom/ABr
Daniella Zalcman
freeedomania
United Nations Photo

You may also like

JAN 9, 2024 Article

Omnipolicy: How the Next Generation is Rethinking U.S. Global Engagement

In 2023, the U.S. Global Engagement initiative engaged in a series of on-campus site visits. How does the next generation think about America's foreign policy?

Launch of OSIRIS-REx, September 2016, Florida. CREDIT: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

NOV 29, 2023 Article

A Human-Centric Epic for NATO Space Domain Awareness

In this report on NATO's annual space policy summit, Visiting Fellow Zhanna Malekos Smith analyzes the challenges the institution faces in the final frontier.

U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams tanks

FEB 6, 2023 Article

Ethics, Escalation, and Engagement in Ukraine and Beyond

Now that HIMAR and Patriot missiles as well as Leopard and Abrams tanks are on the way to Ukraine, NATO unity is at a high ...

Not translated

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Request Translation